Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and his deputy Tejashwi Yadav on Friday welcomed the Supreme Court’s pass now no longer to entertain a batch of pleas tough the Bihar government’s selection to behavior a caste survey withinside the nation. Kumar stated SC’s selection changed into in his government’s favour and it changed into in everyone’s hobby.
“A caste-primarily based totally census is the paintings of the Central government, we’re doing it withinside the nation. If we are able to have information approximately everything, it will likely be simpler for people’s improvement,” the Bihar CM stated. Kumar, who’s on Samadhan Yatra, reached Bihar Sharif. He stated the improvement paintings has been completed in Bihar Sharif.
Victory for the nation government: Tejashwi Yadav
“The petition changed into best for exposure. SC has stated that so long as a survey does not happen, how can it’s acknowledged who must take delivery of a reservation. It’s a victory for Bihar govt. We welcome this order,” he added.
SC refuses to entertain pleas towards caste survey
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a batch of pleas tough the Bihar government’s selection to behavior a caste survey withinside the nation. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath stated there’s no advantage withinside the petitions and brushed off them with liberty to the petitioners to technique the excessive courtroom docket concerned.
“So that is a exposure hobby litigation. How are we able to trouble guidelines on how lots reservation must be granted to such and such caste. Sorry, we can not trouble such guidelines and can not entertain those petitions”, the bench informed the suggest for petitioners.
The pinnacle courtroom docket, which changed into listening to 3 petitions on the difficulty inclusive of one filed with the aid of using an NGO, stated the petitioners can technique the Patna High Court for the ideal remedy. “All the petitions are brushed off as withdrawn with liberty to searching for suitable treatments in law”, the bench ordered.
On January 11, the pinnacle courtroom docket had stated that it might take in the problem on January 20, after one of the petitioners cited an pressing list of the problem.
